TV review: The Crown. Season 6, Episode 10: Sleep, Dearie Sleep

The Queen (Imelda Staunton). In the end, even God couldn’t save her

It’s the end of an era.

After seven years, six series and sixty episodes, Netflix’s The Crown has finally come to an end. Rather than going right up to the present and allowing us to see the cast watching their own early lives being dramatized on TV, the story concludes in 2005, with Charles’s relatively low-key wedding to the love of his life, Camilla Parker-Bowles (Dominic West and Olivia Williams). Had Charles followed his instincts and done this about thirty years earlier, one imagines The Crown would have only needed four series, rather than six. But we’ll never know now, will we?

As it is, Season Six has contained more than its fair share of genuinely crazy moments, notably some cameo appearances from the ghosts of Diana and Dodi Fayed (Elizabeth Debicki and Khalid Abdalla) following their deaths in the 1997 Paris road crash. And guess what? There are more ghosts in this episode (sort of) as the eighty-year-old Queen (Imelda Staunton) is haunted by the spirits of her younger self. We thus see the monarch engaging in conversation with her middle-aged Elizabeth (a welcome return visit to The Crown for Olivia Colman) and later, the younger version from the dawn of her reign (again, good to see Claire Foy from the first two series again) The Queen even gets a quick salute from her teenaged self, played by young Claire Foy lookalike, Viola Prettejohn, who played the teenaged Princess Elizabeth in the wartime scenes of the recent Ritz episode.

The three faces of Queendom: maiden, mother and er…crone

The final Crown ends with Imelda’s Queen walking boldly forward (chess fans will know, Queens can go as far as they like in any direction, as long as its in a straight line) with Colman and Foy following her on either side. It’s a bit like one of those old Doctor Who episodes where all the Doctors (e.g. Hartnell, Troughton and Pertwee) get to meet up in the Tardis simultaneously. Thankfully, unlike Doctor Who, the Queen never had to undergo the awkward and painful process of ‘regeneration’ as she morphed from one actress into another. As her first Prince Philip (Doctor Who Number 11, Matt Smith) could have told her, this would have been no picnic.

Anyway, the purpose of resurrecting these earlier models of the QE2 is to allow us to see the Queen airing her private thoughts as she contemplates announcing her abdication during a speech at Charles’s wedding. Did you know the Queen came very close to doing this? Chances are, you didn’t, simply because it never happened. There is no real evidence that the Queen ever considered abdicating at any point ever. Even if she had done, it’s hardly likely she would have announced her decision on the day of Charles’s wedding. Even in non-royal circles announcing big news during somebody’s else’s wedding ceremony is considered a breach of etiquette.

In this version, the Queen is contemplating abdication as a result of feelings of mortality generated by news of the continuing preparation of Operation London Bridge: the long-running plans for her own state funeral. These plans were first prepared in the Sixties, but were, of course, not put into practice until 2022. By choosing to stay on, the Queen realises she is effectively condemning Britons in the 21^st century to nearly twenty more years of monarchy under one very old Queen followed by decades of kingship under several old men. Not that there’s ever any real drama generated over whether the Queen is going to stand down in 2005 or not. Obviously, she didn’t! Even The Crown would never get away with changing history that much.

Instead, the Queen throws away the handwritten bit of paper announcing her retirement on the spur of the moment. She then launches into a surprisingly irreverent speech reminiscent of a stand-up comedy routine. She only just stops short of taking the piss out of Harry (Luther Ford) for dressing up as a Nazi or joking that she was, in fact, guilty of killing Diana.

The Crown thus ends with the series, like perhaps the nation, much weaker at the end than it was at the start. Charles is at least happy to be finally married to Camilla. William (Ed McVey) is going out with Cate (Meg Bellamy) after seeing her wearing a see-through dress at a fashion show. Wills and Harry are already feuding. Tony Blair (Bertie Carvel), who was recently so popular that the Queen (according to The Crown) envied him to the extent that she was having bizarre dreams in which the founder of New Labour replaced her as monarch, is now unpopular again thanks to the Iraq War. In fact, this isn’t quite true: Blair did win a substantial General Election victory in 2005 and was still fairly popular when he himself stood down two years later. Perhaps writer Peter Morgan feels as if he has to make amends for giving Blair (then played by Michael Sheen) such an easy ride in his screenplay for Stephen Frears’s 2006 film, The Queen. We are spared dramatized versions of Brown, Cameron, May, Johnson or Truss.

We last see the Queen (Staunton) walking slowly across an empty room, then disappearing through a door, a scene presumably intended to illustrate the final seventeen years of her reign followed by her death. So ends The Crown. Despite some great performances and many fine moments, however, unlike the reign of the Queen herself, in the end, most people would probably judge the series to have fallen some way short of genuine greatness.

We three Queens: Staunton, Colman and Foy

Can Trump do a Grover Cleveland?

The possibility of a second Donald Trump presidency undoubtedly fills many people with horror. But if he did manage to win the 2024 US presidential election, he would have accomplished a feat achieved by only one person before. Up until now, Grover Cleveland is the only man to have won a full term as president, before leaving the White House only to return to be elected to serve another full term, four years later. Cleveland (1885-89, 1893-97) is thus counted as both the 22^nd and 24^th US president.

Cleveland’s record is impressive. Aside from Franklin D. Roosevelt, he is the only person to win the popular vote in three US presidential elections. Having won the presidency in 1884, the Democrat, Cleveland was defeated in his bid for re-election by Republican, Benjamin Harrison in 1888. Harrison, a dull, uninspiring figure triumphed in the electoral college despite losing in the popular vote to Cleveland. Cleveland returned to defeat Harrison in 1892, enabling him to embark on a wholly unprecedented non-consecutive second term.

Trump is a very different character from Cleveland, however. For one thing, Cleveland was still only 47 in 1885, making him the youngest ever new president at that point. He was still just shy of sixty when his second term ended twelve years later. Trump, in contrast, would be, at eighty-two, the oldest US president there has ever been, were he to complete a second term in the White House.

Trump’s electoral record has thus far been much less impressive than Cleveland’s. Trump lost the popular vote in both the 2016 election, despite winning in the crucial electoral college and in the 2020 contest with Biden which he lost overall.

For most presidents, leaving the White House marks the end of the road. Since the 1950s, two term presidents like Reagan, Bill Clinton, the second President Bush and Obama have been constitutionally unable to stand for a third term even if they wanted to. Meanwhile, those like Jimmy Carter or George HW Bush who left office after one term, the experience of electoral defeat in a November general election proved so devastating that they usually never sought the presidency again.

There have been exceptions, however. Although he wasn’t actually defeated in the 1908 election, the popular Republican President Theodore Roosevelt resisted widespread pressure to run again in that contest, having previously won handsomely in 1904. It was a decision he soon came to bitterly regret and by 1912, the former President, still only in his early fifties, was campaigning to get his old job back from the outside. But there was a complication: his own party was intent on renominating his successor, President William Taft in 1912. T.R. thus formed his own party and ran as a Progressive “Bull Moose” candidate. However, by choosing to run against the incumbent, he only really succeeded in splitting the Republican vote, pushing Taft into third place and ensuring the victory of Democrat, Woodrow Wilson, who probably not have won otherwise.

Ex-President Herbert Hoover also considered another run for the presidency following his defeat by Democrat, Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1932. This is, in some ways, surprising. Hoover had become very unpopular following the 1929 Wall Street Crash. Hs name had become so strongly associated with the Great Depression that many of the shanty towns which sprung up in its wake became known as “Hoovervilles.” Little wonder, Hoover’s dreams of a political comeback got nowhere.

In Britain, prime ministerial returns to office have proven less unusual. This is largely because a party leader does not automatically lose his or her position, simply because they have lost a General Election and can thus theoretically live on to win back power another day. William Gladstone served as PM four times between 1868 and 1894 while Stanley Baldwin had three separate stints in Downing Street between 1923 and 1937. This has become less common in recent times, however. While it’s true both Winston Churchill and Harold Wilson both came back for a second spell in power, generally most PMs can assume that like Edward Heath, James Callaghan, John Major or Gordon Brown, that if they lead their party to defeat in a General Election, their time is up.

TV review: The Crown. Season 6. Episode 4: Aftermath

No time to Di: Ghost Diana (Elizabeth Debicki) haunts the Queen (Imelda Staunton).

Woo-ooh! Watch out everyone! Halloween may have been and gone, but there are two ACTUAL GHOSTS in this episode. Despite being dispatched in the last episode, the spirits of Princess Diana (Elizabeth Debicki) and Dodi Fayed (Khalid Abdalla) both briefly return to the mortal realm to haunt their relatives. Di visits her grief-stricken ex-husband, Prince Charles (Dominic West) and the Queen (Imelda Staunton) while Dodi pops in on his dad, Mohamed Al-Fayed (Salim Daw).

One wonders if the “psychic” who the then still-living Diana reportedly visited in Episode 2 had anything to do with this? Can we expect to see more phantoms in The Crown’s future? Perhaps a return visit from John Lithgow’s Churchill or from the Queen’s father, George VI (Jared Harris)?Perhaps Charles I? Or Henry VIII? I doubt it.

Of course, they’re presumably not really supposed to be ghosts. If they were everyone would have been a little bit more surprised when they first materialised. For example, when the spectral Diana introduces herself mid-flight with a playful “ta-da!”, Charles would presumably have tried to jump off the plane. It is a dramatic device, albeit a thoroughly silly one which doesn’t work at all.

In truth, this is inevitably a very sombre episode. Di and Dodi are dead and The Crown is quite unstinting in showing Charles and Al-Fayed’s unrestrained grief as they learn the shocking news from Paris. Despite having so recently been engaged in a PR war with his ex-wife, Charles (in this, at least) now does an abrupt volte-face and stands up for the rights of Diana and their two children. The Queen and Philip’s (Jonathan Pryce) stubborn determination to keep buggering on as if nothing has changed, seems positively cold-hearted in comparison. The ghostly Diana plays a crucial role in softening up the Queen’s official response to the tragedy.

We also see Al-Fayed in full grief mode, an element that was entirely absent from Peter Morgan’s last journey into this territory when he wrote 2006’s acclaimed film, The Queen. Al-Fayed is not yet the crazed conspiracy theorist he will become. We get to see Imelda Staunton replicating the Queen’s actual TV broadcast from the time, something Helen Mirren did in the 2006 film. It would be interesting to see the three versions: the late Queen’s, Mirren’s and Staunton’s played side by side.

We also get some nonsense about the young Prince William (Rufus Kampa) going missing for fourteen hours following his mother’s death: an untrue story which goes precisely nowhere (“Have you seen William?…oh, there he is”).

It’s hard to imagine Peter Morgan would have got away with portraying Diana and Dodi as ghosts in the 2006 Helen Mirren film. Guess what? He doesn’t really get away with it here either.

Windsor change: The Queen (Imelda Staunton) changes tack.